Electoral Blow for Opposition (IWPR)
2003-03-18
By Alexei Chubat in Minsk, for IWPR in London,
18 March 2003
For the first time in five year, the opposition
participated in local elections earlier this month, but their hopes of
gaining more influence over domestic politics came to naught. They failed
to win significant numbers of votes, putting the poor performance down
to electoral fraud.
For the first time in five year, the opposition
participated in local elections earlier this month, but their hopes of
gaining more influence over domestic politics came to naught. They failed
to win significant numbers of votes, putting the poor performance down
to electoral fraud.
The main opposition parties had demanded several amendments to the electoral
code as a condition for participating in the 1999 local councils elections
and the 2000 parliamentary ballot. When the amendments were not made they
boycotted the polls, hoping they would thereby undermine their legitimacy
in the eyes of the international community and draw attention to the political
situation in Belarus.
However, by 2003 the parties decided to adopt a different strategy. "The
majority of parties have abandoned the boycotting tactic because it was
ineffective," said Andrei Dmitriev, deputy head of the Minsk council of
the United Civil Party, UCP. "Boycotts could have a negative effect on
the Belarusian people, they could start to think that it really is impossible
to change anything," added Alexei Yanukevich of the Belarusian National
Front, BNF.
Indeed, many political experts regard the opposition as totally ineffective.
Although a survey by the Independent Institute of Socio-economic and Political
Studies showed that the number of President Lukashenko's opponents has
recently doubled, support for the opposition parties has not increased
accordingly. Their popularity ratings remain low, with the NOVAK Statistics
Laboratory rating the Belarusian Social Democratic Party, BSDP, as the
most popular with 4.7 per cent support.
"The opposition are weak, they don't have a clear leader and they seem
incapable of doing anything," said Sergei Sasunkevich, a 23-year-old unemployed
man from Vileika, in the Minsk region. "We don't feel their presence on
the ground at all."
The local elections two weeks ago underlined the opposition's lack of
impact. None of its candidates were elected to the Minsk Council of Deputies
and out of a total of 23,286 available deputy mandates, the BNF and BSDP
won 11 each and the UCP got only five, according to the central electoral
commission. Only the Belarusian Communist Party made significant gains
- they now have 120 local deputies.
Many commentators believe that the entire approach of the opposition is
responsible for their electoral failures. "They are cut off from the people
and are playing in their own sandpit, more like clubs than parties," said
political analyst Vladimir Rovdo.
"Many of the leaders have been in politics for over 10 years, but haven't
done anything worthwhile - all they do is fight amongst themselves," said
Igor Baslyk, a parliamentary deputy and member of the Respublika grouping.
"All their policies rely heavily on stories about how badly we live,"
he said.
The opposition parties themselves insist their poor showing is purely
the result of electoral fraud. "The violations were shocking," said Andrei
Dmitriev of UCP, who participated in one of the pre-election campaigns.
Dmitriev claims that one candidate, who enjoyed 60 per cent support among
the region's voters, was removed from the voting list for bogus reasons
two days before the elections. Observers were illegally ejected during
ballot counts and voter lists packed with 100-300 extra names at each
polling station, he said.
These claims are born out by Klimenty Matyukhov, an observer from the
Nasha Stolitsa association, who said he witnessed some violations in Minsk.
"There were mistakes in the lists of voters, some people were given several
ballot papers each and others received papers without producing the necessary
identification," he said. "Electoral commission members ignored the observers'
warnings of these violations."
The opposition also criticised a recent decision by the OSCE to invite
Belarusian deputies to its parliamentary assembly. "That invitation emboldened
the regime to falsify votes, because it regards any concession as a weakness.
International observers weren't even invited to attend the polls," said
Andrei Dmitriev.
The government, meanwhile, has commended the high quality of work done
by electoral commission members. The day after the elections, President
Lukashenko thanked commission head Lydia Yermoshina and others involved
in the polls. Belarusian citizens had used the elections to express their
lack of support for the opposition, he said.
Despite their lack of success, some observers believe that the opposition
were right to contest the ballot. "Although the falsification of results
was blatant, the opposition parties can only be praised for taking part
in the elections," said Rovdo. "Opposition candidates were removed from
the slates because their high ratings of up to 28 per cent scared the
government."